Lagerspetz, E., 2002. Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 6(1), pp.5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz E. Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2002;6(1):5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz, E. (2002). Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 6(1), 5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz E, ‘Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?’ (2002) 6 Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 5 DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz, Eerik. 2002. “Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 6 (1): 5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz, Eerik. “Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 6, no. 1 (2002): 5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1

Lagerspetz, E.. “Is Political Theory Politically Interesting?”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, vol. 6, no. 1, 2002, pp. 5–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.6.1.1