Kivistö, H.-M., 2016. The Ambivalently Good Human Rights. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 19(2), pp.214–219. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö H-M. The Ambivalently Good Human Rights. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2016;19(2):214–9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö, H.-M. (2016). The Ambivalently Good Human Rights. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 19(2), 214–219. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

1. Kivistö H-M. The Ambivalently Good Human Rights. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2016;19(2):214-219. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö H-M, ‘The Ambivalently Good Human Rights’ (2016) 19 Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 214 DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö, Hanna-Mari. 2016. “The Ambivalently Good Human Rights”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 19 (2): 214–19. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö, Hanna-Mari. “The Ambivalently Good Human Rights”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 19, no. 2 (2016): 214–19. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6

Kivistö, H-M. “The Ambivalently Good Human Rights”. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, vol. 19, no. 2, 2016, pp. 214–19. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.6