Strang, J., 2013. The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The making of the analytic hegemony in Swedish 20^th century philosophy. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 16(1), pp.11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang J. The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The making of the analytic hegemony in Swedish 20^th century philosophy. Redescriptions Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2013;16(1):11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang, J. (2013). The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The making of the analytic hegemony in Swedish 20^th century philosophy. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 16(1), 11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

1. Strang J. The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The making of the analytic hegemony in Swedish 20^th century philosophy. Redescriptions Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2013;16(1):11-38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang J, ‘The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The Making of the Analytic Hegemony in Swedish 20^th Century Philosophy’ (2013) 16 Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 11 DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang, Johan. 2013. “The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The Making of the Analytic Hegemony in Swedish 20^th Century Philosophy”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 16 (1): 11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang, Johan. “The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The Making of the Analytic Hegemony in Swedish 20^th Century Philosophy”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 16, no. 1 (2013): 11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2

Strang, J. “The Rhetoric of Analytic Philosophy: The making of the analytic hegemony in Swedish 20^th century philosophy”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, vol. 16, no. 1, 2013, pp. 11–38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.16.1.2