How to Cite:
Seaward, Paul. 2011. “The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 15 (1): 99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward, P., 2011. The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 15(1), pp.99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward P. The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown. Redescriptions Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2011;15(1):99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward, P. (2011). The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 15(1), 99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
1. Seaward P. The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown. Redescriptions Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2011;15(1):99-124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward P, ‘The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown’ (2011) 15 Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 99 DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward, Paul. 2011. “The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 15 (1): 99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward, Paul. “The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 15, no. 1 (2011): 99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6
Seaward, P. “The Idea of Parliament in British Political Culture, Bolingbroke to Brown”. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, vol. 15, no. 1, 2011, pp. 99–124. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.15.1.6